| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 275 | |
| 121. |  | DEAMBROSI, E.; SALDAIN, N.E. Educación contínua. Manejo de Malezas. Evaluación de herbicidas para el control de capín. ln: INIA TREINTA Y TRES. Arroz. Resultados Experimentales 2004-2005. Treinta y Tres (Uruguay): INIA, 2005. Cap. 8, p. 9-12. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 418)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 136. | | BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; ÁVILA, S.; LAVECCHIA, A.; MARCHESI, C.; DEAMBROSI, E.; MÉNDEZ, R.; SALDAIN, N.E.; ROEL, A.; ZORRILLA DE SAN MARTÍN, G.; ACEVEDO, A. INIA Olimar: características y comportamientos en la zafra 2003/2004. Arroz, 2004, no. 38, p. 40-48.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 275 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
10/08/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
28/05/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
|
Autor : |
ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; BORTAGARAY, I.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA LEONI VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OSCAR RICARDO BLUMETTO VELAZCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALFREDO SANTIAGO ALBIN FERREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Applying the Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis (PIPA) approach to enhance co-innovation for sustainability within livestock family farming in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016. |
|
Páginas : |
17 p. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important
when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused on a participatory evaluation of the whole project, demonstrating that a successful innovation process took place. This Uruguayan case showed that within the coinnovation framework, the PIPA approach nurtured the creation of a common space for social learning and innovation, providing a useful instrument for rural development. MenosABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important
when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused o... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EVALUATION; LEARNING PROCESS; METHODS; MONITORING; NETWORKS; PLANNING. |
|
Thesagro : |
INVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA; PRODUCCION FAMILIAR. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/8203/1/1.2-Albicette-2016-IFSA-Conference-paper.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02902nam a2200313 a 4500
001 1055218
005 2018-05-28
008 2016 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M.
245 $aApplying the Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis (PIPA) approach to enhance co-innovation for sustainability within livestock family farming in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016.$c2016
300 $a17 p.
520 $aABSTRACT. Participatory approaches are needed to ensure learning processes and to incorporate lessons learned during the implementation of a project. This is particularly important when the aim is to improve farm sustainability considering changes in knowledge and skills, natural resources management and networking. This paper describes the Participatory Impact Pathways Analysis (PIPA) implemented within the participatory action research project ?Coinnovating for the sustainable development of livestock family-farming systems in Rocha, Uruguay?, which involved stakeholders for planning, monitoring and evaluating of the project?s progress. Six workshops were implemented during 2012 - 2015 to enhance the project?s actions. Participatory methods were used to adapt PIPA to the Uruguayan culture. During 2013 an interinstitutional network was established, a shared vision of expected project results was defined, as well as impact pathways, goals and activities to achieve them. During the 2014- 2015 workshops, reflections and suggestions led in turn to new or modified activities. This process contributed to confidence and commitment building, improving the quality of the established relationships and strengthening networking to enhance the dissemination of the project findings. As a result of the learning process, and inspired in the project?s methodological and technological results, one stakeholder organization established a project for another region. The last workshop focused on a participatory evaluation of the whole project, demonstrating that a successful innovation process took place. This Uruguayan case showed that within the coinnovation framework, the PIPA approach nurtured the creation of a common space for social learning and innovation, providing a useful instrument for rural development.
650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA
650 $aPRODUCCION FAMILIAR
653 $aEVALUATION
653 $aLEARNING PROCESS
653 $aMETHODS
653 $aMONITORING
653 $aNETWORKS
653 $aPLANNING
700 1 $aLEONI, C.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
700 1 $aBLUMETTO, O.
700 1 $aALBIN, A.
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
